Skip to content
Geography / Decision science / Institutional consequence

Maps are optional.
Decisions are not.

The world is not a map. Geography shapes what we see. Institutions shape what we measure. Decisions determine who lives with the consequences.

I work where those three collide.

The central question

Accurate for what? Useful to whom? And who gets to decide?

Every model, map, metric, and risk score carries choices. The work is to make those choices visible before they harden into policy.

Featured ideas

Follow the decisions.

01 / ESSAYS

The Geography of Decisions

An essay series about the spatial assumptions embedded in power, policy, and everyday institutional choices.

Explore →
02 / KEYNOTE

The Projection Problem

A challenge to the idea that maps simply show the world as it is.

Explore →
03 / FRAMEWORK

Geospatial Decision Framework

A practical way to move from geographic information toward defensible decisions.

Explore →
What I do

Intelligence is not the same as judgment.

Better data can sharpen a decision. It cannot tell an institution what it values, which trade-offs it accepts, or who bears the cost when it gets things wrong.

My work connects spatial intelligence, climate risk, insurance, and decision science to the institutional systems that turn information into action.

Meet the thinker ↗
An invitation

Bring me the decision, not just the map.

For speaking, strategic advisory, research collaborations, and conversations that are willing to question the premise.

Get in touch ↗